|
On Choosing a Singing Teacher
The first question a prospective student must ask is: “What
kind of a teacher do I want?”
Teachers come in all shapes, sizes and abilities; and picking one
can sometimes be a bewildering experience.
The famous singer
The famous singer who has sung well naturally and has consequently
never had to think about how it is done, and has certainly never
read any literature about either singing or teaching. The success
of the career, fame and ego have blotted out everything else. Often
these lessons descend into a recital of the singer’s many
triumphs. All questions tend to be regarded either as an insult
or as an indication of the student’s lack of talent. This
teacher can do no wrong! Beware!
The vocal coach
Often an ex singer of note or an opera house repetiteur. These,
when they are good, teach style and interpretation often to an advanced
level. Their insight into music, text and character can be revelatory.
They do not, however, teach how to produce the sounds and colours
they ask for. They are not teachers of singing. The best can often
give helpful hints picked up from professionals which can assist
the singer to produce a new or different expression. The worst,
having learnt unsound information, can seriously mislead.
The 'magic formula' teacher.
“I teach the so-and-so method”, which can range from
sinus tone production to lower abdominal breathing and other improbabilities.
Among this type are many who claim to teach bel canto without a
smidgeon of knowledge of the training methods and precepts of the
18th. and early 19th. centuries.
The trendy teacher.
This sort has no fixed ideas about any method, but often believes
that there are as many methods as singers, and bounces about teaching
whatever seems to be in vogue at the moment.
The “zoologist”
This one purports to train voices on animal noises or the “primal
scream”.
Because of the unmusical nature of these methods, they are very
often backed up by a great deal of psuedo-scientific information
including exploded drawings of larynxes, muscle groups and the like,
in order to impose some credibility. Neither screaming nor any other
form of bestial vocalizing has anything to do with the disciplined
training of the muscle coordination which produces good singing.
The repertoire teacher
This teacher believes in training voices
through repertoire only. Commonly he/she is a good musician and
can accompany well. Often he/she is not, and was not, a practising
singer. Technical training is confined to a few exercises at the
beginning of the lesson, rushed through without regard to the manner
in which they are sung, to “warm up the voice” before
the real work starts later in the lesson.
The U-turn teacher
Normally, this type had a minimal career and then made a u-turn
into teaching. Typically, he/she churns out the teaching given to
him/her as a student (often by a teacher with a similar history),
so the mistakes of one generation are passed on to the next.
The “Svengali” teacher
This “guru” latches on to students with ability and
never lets go. This teacher is determined to further his/her own
reputation on the back of the students’ success. In consequence,
it is absolutely necessary that the natural talent of the students
must be high. Students of lesser ability are unlikely to receive
the encouragement and guidance they need.
What then is a good singing teacher?
Firstly, he /she should have a firm grasp of the principles of good
vocalism which have been taught for nearly 400 years and are still
valid today.
These are: -
- A clean, precise, non violent beginning to the sound
- An individual development of the separate registers, subsequently blending them to result in a seamless join.
- An even tone throughout a range of at least two octaves.
- A command of crescendo and diminuendo all over the voice, resulting in complete breath control.
- Clarity of vowels and good consonant ennunciation to give perfect diction without loss of tonal bloom.
- A combination of good agility and sustaining power.
- A perfect legato.
- An even and regular trill.
These principles apply to all voices - light, fast voices should
be able to sing long slow melodies as well as spectacular coloratura;
and strong, powerful voices should be able to move quickly and easily
when necessary. Both types should be able to trill.
The ability to teach this corpus of technical knowledge should
be a must for a competent teacher of voice.
In addition, a complete teacher, the paragon, should be a good
and thorough musician, familiar with several languages in order
to correct pronunciation, and also should have an in-depth acquaintance
with a wide repertoire. A final bonus would be a successful professional
career which gives an inner dimension to any advice which a teacher
is called upon to give.
So, with these precepts in mind, how should a prospective student
make a choice?
Initially, he/she should question other students and if possible
be brave enough to ask questions of prospective teachers. A sound
one will not resent being asked what he/she teaches, an unsound
one usually will. If this happens it can be an extremely revelatory
experience. An intelligent student can glean much from other students
about their teachers and what is taught, both from conversation
and from listening to their singing in relation to what they say.
Also, take notice of those teachers whose pupils continue to improve,
month on month, year on year. Do not fall into the trap of going
to the teachers whose pupils have the best voices, they are always
natural and their quality is not due to any teacher. Pay attention
to the pupils who continue to improve and whose faults are corrected.
Theirs are the teachers who can teach.
Lastly, don’t be cheap. Good sound singing lessons are worth
their weight in gold. Don’t learn incorrect technique or be
led into sloppy ways which will have to be corrected later from
lack of money. Seek out the best teachers and afford them. In the
long term you will reap your rewards.
And practise!
A teacher can only guide and advise – you have to do the
work!
© 2005, Neil Howlett
|